[Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Ouput directory other than source directory
- From: Anthony Fok <nospam@thanx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 02:18:54 -0600
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 02:39:12PM +0200, email@example.com wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Xose Manoel Ramos wrote:
> > El Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 03:35:45PM +0200, David Odin contaba:
> > >I personnaly have my wml files in ~/Giram.wml and they're output in
> > >~/Giram.html using the -o switch.
> > > All the gifs and jpegs are in ~/Giram.html/images and I've made a symbolic
> > >links ~/Giram.wml/images that points to ~/Giram.html/images. That way wml
> > >find the pictures when it looks for them and the paths are always correct.
> > Not a bad idea, this kind of hacks can work fine. I had think before
> > on this idea, using links. But I still dislike it....
> Could you explain why you want to put output files in another directory?
> Are you sure this make sense?
The Debian web site currently uses "make install" to copy all the *.html
files etc. to a different directory. Two reasons that I can think of are:
1. The public can't view the .wml files and Makefile etc. directly.
(safer for Debian.) :-)
2. Less stuff for worldwide Debian mirrors site to mirror.
There may be other reasons that I have missed. I wasn't the one who set
up all the supporting Makefile and templates for the Debian web site. :-)
Anthony Fok Tung-Ling Civil and Environmental Engineering
firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com University of Alberta, Canada
firstname.lastname@example.org Keep smiling! *^_^*
Come visit Our Lady of Victory Camp -- http://come.to/olvc
Website META Language (WML) www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List email@example.com
Automated List Manager firstname.lastname@example.org