[Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Remove duplicate mails using procmail [was: Re: New Vim Syntax File!]

On 01 Mar 2000, James A. Treacy <treacy@debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > 
> >  Pretty please, Stephane: No need to reply _both_ in mail and to the
> > list. I am subscribed to it, so please leave it on the list and don't
> > load my mailbox twice. TIA!
> > 
> Please, let's not start the all to common war about reply vs. reply-to
> here. :)

 I didn't wanted to start a war - just wanted to point out something
that bugged me. I only did send it to the list because I was already
sending this message to the list. I would have never sent it just as
message alone.

> What I do suggest is that you use procmail. The following in your

 I am handy with procmail - but the problem is, that I have to
_download_ the message before I can apply it's filters to it, right? And
there are many people that have to pay for the download volume. Don't
forget this fact.

[Rep2: <me> for not relevant to list]
 Is reply-to similar to f'up2 in usenet? Or is there something really
similar to that?

 So long!
What is mind?  No matter.
What is matter?  Never mind.
                -- Thomas Hewitt Key, 1799-1875
Website META Language (WML)                www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List                   sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager                       majordomo@engelschall.com