[Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [wml] Re: [wml] Re: [wml] e) or f) : unknown tags parsing

On Tue, 30 May 2000, Tobias Oetiker wrote:

> Today you sent me mail regarding [wml] Re: [wml] Re: [wml] e) or f) :...:
> *> Here is the proposed syntax for parsing unknown tags:
> *> - they are complex by default
> *> - when there is a trailing slash or when tag name ends with an asterisk, 
> *>   it is a simple tag
> *> 
> *> Sounds good.
> yep indeed. It will meen some updating the the standard wml
> packagaes probably ... 


> do we need some explicit protection for random <dddd   > structures
> in perl code for example ...

If we vote for case (b), then Perl code must be protected (as it always
had to be).  In previous messages, i explain why i believe it cannot be
done automatically.

Denis Barbier
WML Maintainer

Website META Language (WML)                www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List                   sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager                       majordomo@engelschall.com