[Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [wml] Re: 2.0.3 - bug or feature

Salü Joey

Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:37:33 -0600 (MDT), you wrote:
>   Not every successful OSS project follows the even-stable/odd-unstable
> method. In the PHP project, we simply formed a team "php-qa", for

PHP: another great project! 

> quality assurance, and the members of that team have the task of

>   That said, I think WML would be a decent candidate for the even/odd
> cycle, bcz the maintainer (Denis, please take a bow) seems to be
> /almost/ the only one DOING anything here. I know I'm guilty of
> whining, and so are a few others. (No need to name names, or
> anything.) Maybe if there were a *known unstable branch*, people would
> be more willing to pitch in.

Yes. How could this be done if not from the ones who use
it? If there is some time left for me, I'll update to 2.0.x
carefully and hope to be able to have some constructive
remarks then.


Website META Language (WML)                www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List                   sw-wml@engelschall.com
Automated List Manager                       majordomo@engelschall.com