[Date Index][Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: bug in href or toc?
- From: "Thomas R. Koll" <nospam@thanx>
- Date: 11 Feb 2002 19:05:51 +0100
Am Mon, 2002-02-11 um 18.12 schrieb Denis Barbier:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 01:10:00PM +0100, Thomas R. Koll wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 11:19:07PM +0100, Werner Heuser wrote:
> > IMHO wlm::std::toc is missing some features like excluding a <hX> from the
> > TOC (even though <protect> might do it) and an additional <nobr> style
> > (see my patch from last year).
> Hmm, are you telling me I forgot something ;)
> Will look at it again.
You rejected it last time so y should I try again?
> > So try <protect> if you really want no TOC
> IMO output should be
> <h3><a name="ToC4"></a><a href="http://www.fujitsu-siemens.de">Fujitsu</a>:
> Lifebook Biblo B-2130</h3>
> IIRC this construct (i.e. an empty <a> tag) was avoided because older
> Netscape did not recognize them as anchors.
> Maybe it is time to leave such workarounds behind and deal with decent
> browsers. Comments?
For CSS it surely would be better.
Thomas R. Koll - Totalverweigerer
http://www.TomK32.de - just a geek trying to change the world
http://www.sf.net/projects/mysecretdiary/ -- wanna code PHP ?
Website META Language (WML) www.engelschall.com/sw/wml/
Official Support Mailing List email@example.com
Automated List Manager firstname.lastname@example.org